Why International Streaming Platforms are Scaling Back in South Africa 📺 🇿🇦
🚀 Britbox's Exit: Last week, Britbox announced its departure from South Africa after three years, joining other international streaming platforms like Acorn TV, Paramount+, Amazon Prime, and Disney+ in scaling back their investments in the country.
📉 Market Dynamics: Despite being Africa’s most mature streaming market, the increasing competition for subscribers in South Africa has significantly driven up customer acquisition costs. High capital expenditure on content acquisition further compounds the challenges for streaming platforms.
💡 Expert Insight: Thinus Ferreira, a streaming analyst, highlights that streaming platforms don't earn as much per subscriber as traditional pay-TV providers. For instance, Netflix’s Premium subscription costs R200 ($11) compared to DStv’s R929 ($50) per user.
🏆 Local Competition: Platforms like MultiChoice-owned Showmax have a deep understanding of the local market and can repurpose content from DStv channels, giving them a unique edge. This local advantage helps them compete more effectively against international platforms.
💥 Bundling Strategies: In the US, streaming platforms are using bundled packages to retain subscribers. However, South Africa's market hasn't matured to this level, necessitating costly subscriber acquisition strategies.
🔄 Future Prospects: For international platforms, the high cost and competitive nature of the South African market make further investment less appealing. Local players like Showmax continue to thrive by leveraging their understanding of the market and existing content resources.
Highlights:
- Britbox and Others Exit: Focus on more established markets for growth.
- High Costs: Increased competition drives up customer acquisition and content costs.
- Revenue Comparison: Streaming vs. traditional pay-TV (e.g., Netflix vs. DStv).
- Showmax Advantage: Local content and market understanding.
- Market Maturity: Lack of bundled packages in South Africa.
Read more on TechCabal
